Crushing it with California WineWorks

Yesterday, my wife and I spent a couple hours with friends at California WineWorks in Mahwah, NJ.

If you are a foodie and/or enjoy wines as well, this place is a must try.

The concept at the wineworks is simple and brilliant. You gather up a group of friends and make a bunch of wine together.

The WineWorks does all the heavy lifting and keeps you from ruining your vintage while teaching you the basics of wine making and allowing you to get your hands dirty.

They bring in the grapes from Napa, they have the experts walking you through each step and they  make sure you operate the heavy machinery correctly.  They even serve up the spirits and antipasta while you’re there.

Yesterday, on our first visit to the hidden warehouse, we did the crushing.

<< Here is a picture of my awesome wife mixing something or another.

I must admit that I did not contribute the most to our efforts yesterday and instead stayed in the background taking pictures and drinking wine.

Next week, our cabal will return and do some kind of squeezing and then put the wine in barrels.

Then, we will return again in 4 months and bottle the wine.

If anyone has a great idea for a name for our wine and/or a label design, please send it along.  If I choose yours, I will send you a bottle. :)

Market Shrinkology 10/26/10: Psychological Assessment of Markets

On this episode of Market Shrinkology, I go into the details of a psychological model for assessing markets. This 3 pronged model examines technicals, sentiment and fundamentals and constructs a profile based on this integration of these three factors.

On this episode of Market Shrinkology, I go into the details of a psychological model for assessing markets.  This 3 pronged model examines technicals, sentiment and fundamentals and constructs a profile based on this integration of these three factors.

This discussion fleshes out this post from earlier today introducing the 3 pronged model.

You can watch this episode below:


Assessing the Market Here and the Financials

Last night, I made the following remark on The StockTwits Stream:

Just as everyone is becoming convinced the banks no longer matter, they will begin to again and in a big way $XLF $BAC

Since early September, the $XLF has traded in a tightening range between 14.25 and 15 even as the broader market has been grinding higher. I like buying premium on both sides here.

Similar to the indecisive (or consolidating) financial sector, the market, despite the upward bias, is sending off some mixed signals as I assess them psychologically and the action in this sector is a reflection of this indecision.

When pundits speak about the psychological aspects of the market, they are generally talking about sentiment.  This is an inaccurate and overly narrow depiction of what a psychological assessment of the market is.

Psychology is not only about sentiment (or emotion) which is but one of several modes of experience.  A more comprehensive psychological assessment of markets focuses on three modes of experience including sentiment (emotional), technical (behavioral) and fundamental (cognitive).

Sentiment

In one sense, market sentiment remains stubbornly moderate even in the face of a 10+% rally in the $SPX in less than 2 months.  Many smart traders have been and continue to be underweight the market and have missed the run.  I view the skepticism here as a net positive.

During some rallies, there is a tendency for traders who catch the move early to take profits too soon and then search in vain for a better entry, a cycle which helps to fuel higher prices.

On the other hand, the $VIX has been in a downtrend since the June spike and often regresses abruptly so there is heightened risk of a sudden even if brief correction.

Net Sentiment: Mixed to Positive

Technicals

Broad market behavior grinds higher in a 2 month uptrend and consolidates in a fashion that is more choppy than most swing traders prefer.  As well, and more recently, volume has tapered.

As mentioned above, financials have not participated while the demise of their importance has been greatly exagerated.  Rest assured, eventually they will matter.

At the same time though, speculative stocks including China plays are ripping higher which often represents speculation.

Net Technicals: Mixed to Positive.

Fundamentals

We can argue these all day long.  Are we experiencing a recovery? Is QE2 ultimately poison? Is the job market on the cusp of improving as earnings recover?  I view this as a neutral as I have no edge here whatsoever.

Taken together, I view the market with a mixed to positive bias.  As such, I am taking less risk than usual here.

The one trade I do like involves getting long volatility in the banks on both sides. There is only so much further the $SPX can go without $XLF and if the banks break down they will pull the market down and display greater volatility.

Using Visualization to Improve your Trading

Last night, SMB Capital aired a presentation on their StockTwitsTV program that I gave to their traders last week which focused on using guided visualization and relaxation to improve trading performance.

Last night, SMB Capital aired a presentation on their StockTwitsTV program that I gave to their traders last week which focused on using guided visualization and relaxation to improve trading performance.

I am a bit surprised and very pleased by the response the program is receieving and will make it a point to begin addressing some of the specific questions I’ve received in blog posts this week.

Meanwhile, if you missed the program, you can watch it here:

The Twitter Mood Stock Market Study and Hedge Funds

At this moment, hedge funds are pouring over the Twitter (and StockTwits) API and they are testing their models against the market directly. Distinct from their distant cousins at the universities, they are not sharing their results (you will not hear much about this) and the veracity of their methodologies are not subject to the same human shortcomings.

Since writing about the Twitter mood study by Bollen and colleagues from IU a week ago Friday, I have seen a bunch of articles on this topic with many words and many of the same details recounted.

Writers just love to repeat each other and they do it to sell product made by Procter and Gamble ($PG) and Ford ($F) while instead they could simply be linking. :)

Meanwhile, no one has made the money point and even though I did not intend to write twice on this, I am left with little choice as I only indirectly alluded to it in my first missive.

Academics, and especially social scientists, participate in a process of discovery which occurs publically only slowly over time. This process involves multiple researchers from multiple universities focusing on similar sets of hypotheses, formulating studies, critiqueing themselves and these peers, refining methodology, rerunning the studies with new methodologies, republishing, tweaking still further until finally reaching some semblance of a conclusion.

The kicker here, of course, is that even while this supposedly objective process occurs in the open, still confirmation and political biases abound.

Meanwhile, in this particular instance, there is another cohort working on the same problem.  They are not publishing and their measure of success is much less inefficient and not at all dependent upon the political whims of academic institutions.

At this moment, hedge funds are pouring over the Twitter (and StockTwits) API and they are testing their models against the market directly.  Distinct from their distant cousins at the universities, they are not sharing their results (you will not hear much about this) and the veracity of their methodologies are not subject to the same human shortcomings.

They ask: Does the model distill alpha?  This is a simple question with an outcome set that is inarguable.

Tonight's Market Shrinkology: Cutting Losses

On Tuesday evenings, I do a program on StockTwits.TV called Market Shrinkology which focuses on the psychological aspects of trading and investing.

Tonight, I will flesh out a recent post on cutting losses quickly and answer questions about this topic.

If you have questions, you can ask in the comments or feel free to ask me directly on the StockTwits stream.

Below is a paper by Shefrin and Statman titled The Disposition to Sell Winners too Early and Ride Losers too Long. Its a critical piece of  behavioral finance research, germane to tonight’s discussion and essential for those who are interested in market participant experience.

Disposition Effect

Tonight’s Market Shrinkology: Cutting Losses

On Tuesday evenings, I do a program on StockTwits.TV called Market Shrinkology which focuses on the psychological aspects of trading and investing.

Tonight, I will flesh out a recent post on cutting losses quickly and answer questions about this topic.

If you have questions, you can ask in the comments or feel free to ask me directly on the StockTwits stream.

Below is a paper by Shefrin and Statman titled The Disposition to Sell Winners too Early and Ride Losers too Long. Its a critical piece of  behavioral finance research, germane to tonight’s discussion and essential for those who are interested in market participant experience.

Disposition Effect

Choice Getaway for October 17: Warwick Valley Winery

If you live in or around New York City and would like to escape for the day then I’ve got your plan.

The Warwick Valley Winery and Distillery is a choice spot that’s not too far from the concrete and this is the perfect day to do it.  The weather forecast predicts sunny and 65 and Autumn is going bizonkers out here.

Theyve a huge lawn with live music from 2 to 5, vendors selling ridiculous lunch fare, an assortment of wines and the best apple and pear ciders ever.

I will be there so ping me if you make it.

Load More Posts